Skip to content

Refactoring Overview

This document provides a high-level summary of the refactoring analysis across the legacy system.

Why Refactoring Was Needed

  • Large volumes of dead code (unreachable_action).
  • Flow inconsistencies across controllers.
  • Behavioural and architectural drift.
  • Maintainability challenges and onboarding difficulty.

How the Refactor Analysis Works

  1. Stage 4 extracts method-level issues.
  2. Stage 4.5 classifies each method into one of five automation strategies:
  3. safe_delete
  4. template
  5. llm_method_local
  6. micro_fix_review_required
  7. manual
  8. Stage 5 groups these into controller-level packs.
  9. Stage 6 builds execution plans (safe-delete + LLM patch plans).

How Developers Should Use This

  • Trust safe_delete items—they are pure dead code.
  • Review LLM-local patches carefully.
  • Treat micro-fix review items as actionable technical debt.
  • Manual structural items require deeper architectural intervention.

🔗 Source JSON Data (Full Dataset)

This page links to all generated machine-readable data.

🤖